Call Telegram Viber WhatsApp
Criminal Law · Kyiv

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Trust and professionalism. Your reliable partner in resolving criminal matters.

Defense during the pre-trial investigation and in courts of all instances. Involving a lawyer early is the best defense strategy.

14
years of experience
1–3
defense instances
Ukraine
nationwide
Criminal Defense Lawyer
Criminal Defense Lawyer Certified · since 2019
Why Choose Me

Benefits of Working with Me

95% of cases won
Payment instalments available
Official agreement
Recovery of your legal costs from the other party
Tracking changes in legislation
Cost savings through the E-Court
Continuous updates on your case
Don't take on cases with no chance of success
Yaroslav Shumeiko — attorney in Kyiv
14 years of legal experience
About Me

Yaroslav Shumeiko

I help people defend their rights in courts across Ukraine. I work honestly: I explain the case's prospects and the full cost before starting any work.

✓Graduated with honours from Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University (2012)
✓Hold a certificate of the right to practise law
✓Practising attorney — handling cases across all of Ukraine
✓Don't take on cases with no chance of success, and keep clients informed at every stage
Criminal Law

Services and Prices

The exact cost of handling your case can only be determined after a consultation.

Consultation

from2000 UAH

Review of the case file, legal analysis, and development of a defense strategy

from7000 UAH

Preparation of procedural documents (motions, complaints, attorney inquiries)

from2000 UAH

Comprehensive defense at the pre-trial investigation stage

from26000 UAH

Gathering evidence

from2000 UAH

Building a legal position (defense strategy)

from2000 UAH

Attorney's participation in one court hearing

from2500 UAH

Defense in court of first instance

from26000 UAH

Defense in the court of appeal

from35000 UAH

Defense in the court of cassation

from45000 UAH
Track Record

Cases I Have Won

Case №952/371/20

Return of the indictment

Client's problem

A minor was charged under Part 2 of Article 121 of the Criminal Code (causing grievous bodily harm); the indictment contained numerous violations of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC): no clear wording, inaccuracies about the circumstances, time, and place.

The lawyer prepared a motion to return the indictment to the prosecutor due to non-compliance with Article 291 of the CPC, plus a motion to lift the seizure of property.

Result

The court returned the indictment to the prosecutor to correct the defects. The client avoided having the case heard in that form.

Case in the register ↗
Case №952/371/20

Verdict overturned and case reheard

Client's problem

The client was sentenced to 7 years under Part 2 of Article 121 of the Criminal Code. The court merely repeated the wording of the indictment, in violation of Article 374 of the CPC.

The lawyer filed an appeal, proving material violations of procedural law and of the principle of directness in examining evidence.

Result

The court of appeal overturned the verdict and ordered a new hearing. The client avoided serving the 7-year sentence pending the new proceedings.

Case in the register ↗
Case №952/371/20

Preliminary hearing in a grievous bodily harm case

Client's problem

After the verdict was overturned, the case was sent back for a new hearing; the client again faced a risk of an actual prison term under Part 2 of Article 121 of the Criminal Code.

The lawyer analyzed the prosecution's earlier mistakes and filed a series of motions to protect the client's rights.

Result

The case was accepted for hearing taking into account the appellate court's findings — the defense has a chance to influence the outcome.

Case in the register ↗
Case №638/1992/22

Misappropriation of property in one's custody

Client's problem

A financially liable person was convicted of misappropriating funds; the defense pointed to the inadmissibility and incompleteness of the evidence.

Appeals were filed arguing that intent was not proven, that the inventory procedure was flawed, and that there was no direct evidence.

Result

The 3-year prison sentence was overturned due to material violations; a new hearing was ordered.

Case in the register ↗
Case №953/3842/22

Aiding in the submission of false information during state registration

Client's problem

The defendant was considered involved in submitting false data to register a legal entity; the court imposed a fine and a ban on certain activities.

The lawyer challenged the insufficiency of evidence of the client's direct involvement and procedural violations by the prosecution.

Result

The appeal was partially granted: the client was released from punishment due to the expiry of the limitation period.

Case in the register ↗
Fully Transparent

How We Will Work Together

1

You submit a request through the website form or a messenger, or call me directly.

2

At the consultation you describe your situation, I review the materials, form a position, and advise on the next steps.

3

We sign a legal services agreement — and get to work.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions About Criminal Cases

Answer. You have the right to know the reason for the detention, the right to a lawyer and confidential communication with them, the right not to testify against yourself or your relatives, and the right to require a report (protocol) to be drawn up. Without a lawyer, it is better to refrain from giving explanations.

Answer. Stay calm and use your right to a lawyer. Do not give explanations without your lawyer present and do not try to "prove your innocence" yourself when talking to the investigator. The lawyer will build a defense position and gather evidence in your favor.

Answer. Answer clearly and only the questions asked; you have the right to decline to answer questions that could testify against you. Give all explanations in the presence of your lawyer. Do not sign the report (protocol) if it does not match what you said.

Answer. A person serving a sentence of imprisonment is not subject to mobilization. Mobilization is only possible after serving the sentence and after the criminal record is expunged or spent, provided there are no other restrictions.

Answer. Demand to see the court order and check its details. Call a lawyer, record the actions of law enforcement officers on video, read the report (protocol) carefully before signing, and require that any objections be noted if there were violations.

Answer. Yes, in many cases this is possible if there are grounds provided for by the Criminal Procedure Code (changed circumstances, health condition, bail, etc.). A motion with proper evidence must be filed; the lawyer will prepare the documents and represent your interests in court.

Answer. Contact a lawyer immediately and do not sign any documents without reading them first. You have the right to review the materials of the suspicion notice and submit your own evidence. Early involvement of a lawyer helps avoid serious mistakes.

Answer. At the first consultation (up to 20 minutes) we will go through your situation in detail. I will review the documents, honestly assess the case's prospects, and suggest a concrete step-by-step plan of action. You will get clarity, even if you decide not to continue working with me.

Answer. The first consultation is free. The cost of further services depends on how complex the case is. I always state the full, transparent cost before starting any work. No hidden fees.

Answer. No professional attorney can promise a 100% win, since the decision is made by the court. What I do promise is a thorough analysis of the case, my full effort, complete confidentiality, and the use of all my experience to protect your interests.

Answer. Completely. Everything you discuss with me is protected by attorney–client privilege from the first second of our conversation — even during the free consultation. This is an inviolable rule of the profession.

Answer. Click the "Free consultation" button on the website or call me. We will pick a convenient time, you will briefly describe the problem, and we will start solving it.

Blog

Related articles

Client Reviews

What Clients Say

★★★★★
4.9 · over 100 reviews
★★★★★

In August 2023, he helped me with marriage registration, without fuss and complication. First a phone consultation, then a meeting at the office, and then the result, just as we ag…

S
Serhii
★★★★★

Fate introduced me to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych more than two years ago. When I was in complete confusion due to a decision issued against me, I was looking for legal assistance. Our c…

M
Mykhailo
★★★★★

I contacted Yaroslav regarding a traffic accident, or more precisely, a situation when the case was dragged out and closed under article 38. Accordingly, I did not receive payment …

R
Ruslan
★★★★★

Thank you for detailed consultation and professional help! I turned to more than one lawyer – without results. Besides exorbitant prices and lack of any guarantees, each time I was…

O
Olena
★★★★★

Yaroslav Vitaliiovych helped me dissolve my marriage in October this year. He answered all my questions quickly and clearly. Thank you for the quality handling of the case and for …

A
Alisa
★★★★★

I want to express my gratitude to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych and his team. I was an intern there, and the atmosphere and conditions were positive and supportive throughout the internshi…

M
Milana
★★★★★

Thank you for helping resolve a traffic accident case in Kharkiv. The lawyer helped solve the problem and keep our rights intact. I recommend to everyone who wants quality service …

D
Dmytro
★★★★★

He helped me win a family law case. I liked the consultation and the full case management. I didn't even have to go to court. I'm satisfied with the result. I recommend!

S
Stanislav
★★★★★

Very glad I chose lawyer Yaroslav Shumeiko. I found him myself, mainly from reviews about problems under article 130. Very satisfied with the help received, thank you! The price fo…

I
Ivan
★★★★★

A true professional. Quickly helps resolve any issues. Big thanks to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych for your attentiveness. Quality at the highest level

M
Mila
★★★★★

I contacted him regarding an illegal fine. Very impressed with the client approach and loyalty. Thank you for professionalism and good service. The case was won without my personal…

H
Healthy Lifestyle
★★★★★

I contacted him about an illegal fine. He helped resolve the problem quickly and professionally. I recommend to everyone if you have any questions in the field of 'automobile law'.

K
Kateryna

Reviews translated from Ukrainian.