Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp
Trust and professionalism in pension cases.
Pension recalculation, crediting of work record, appealing refusals from the Pension Fund of Ukraine (PFU), and court recognition of pension rights.
I help people defend their rights in courts across Ukraine. I work honestly: I explain the case's prospects and the full cost before starting any work.
The exact cost of handling your case can only be determined after a consultation. Full "turnkey" support is available separately.
The PFU refused an old-age pension after finding an uncorroborated correction of the birth date in the work record book, and disallowed more than 20 years of service.
A claim was filed to overturn the decision, supported by copies of the work record book and other evidence; it was proven that formal defects do not deprive a person of the right to a pension (the Instruction on Maintaining Work Record Books, Supreme Court case law).
The court overturned the refusal by the PFU Main Directorate and ordered it to reconsider the application. The client was later awarded a pension.
Case in the register ↗A former serviceman obtained a certificate of monetary allowance for a recalculation from 01.04.2019, but the PFU refused, understating the payments.
A claim was filed with the administrative court, supported by the certificate and grounded in Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 103 of 21.02.2018 and court case law.
The court fully granted the claim, ordering the pension to be recalculated and paid from 01.04.2019. The pension amount was increased.
Case in the register ↗The period from 03.12.1984 to 15.04.1991 was not credited due to a correction in the dismissal order number; the service record was deemed insufficient.
A claim was filed with a copy of the work record book, archival inquiries, and Supreme Court positions that the employer is responsible for maintaining the book.
The court overturned the refusal and ordered the disputed period to be credited. The client was awarded an old-age pension.
Case in the register ↗The PFU refused a preferential pension, citing the absence of a Commission decision, and disallowed work as an electric and gas welder at liquidated enterprises.
Archival certificates and documents were gathered; it was proven that the work record book and archives take priority over the Commission's procedures (the Law on Pension Insurance, Procedure No. 637, Supreme Court case law).
The court ruled the refusal unlawful; the decision was upheld on appeal. The client was awarded a pension under List No. 2.
Case in the register ↗The PFU refused a recalculation because the register showed no contribution payments for 2009–2010 and 2016–2022.
It was proven that missing contributions in the register do not deprive a person of service credit if the work is confirmed by the work record book and payslips; the duty to pay contributions rests with the employer.
The court ruled the decision unlawful and ordered the disputed periods to be credited. The pension was recalculated and increased.
Case in the register ↗The PFU did not credit the periods 1979–1987 and 1996–1998 due to an unclear stamp and a corrected order date.
An administrative claim was filed with evidence of employment; it was proven that inaccuracies in stamps or dates are not grounds for refusal (Supreme Court case law).
The court overturned the refusal and ordered the application to be reconsidered. The client was awarded a pension.
Case in the register ↗The PFU in Donetsk region refused the pension over missing order numbers and the enterprise name; work from 1976–1988 was not credited.
A claim was filed with archival certificates; it was proven that the work record book is the primary document of service, and the employer bears responsibility for maintaining it.
The claim was granted, and the decision was upheld on appeal. The entire period was credited and a pension was awarded.
Case in the register ↗The PFU did not credit entrepreneurial activity from 1994–2005 because the register had no data on contribution payments.
The legality of the activity and tax payments were proven with tax authority certificates; missing register data does not indicate non-payment.
The court fully granted the claim and ordered all periods from 1994–2005 to be credited. The client was awarded a pension.
Case in the register ↗The PFU refused to award the pension from the day after the client turned 60, citing technical reasons; payments were awarded late.
Under Article 45 of the Law on Pension Insurance, it was proven that a person is entitled to a pension from the day after reaching pension age, provided the application is filed within 3 months.
Courts of two instances ruled the refusal unlawful and ordered the pension to be calculated from 10.09.2023. The client received all payments due.
Case in the register ↗You submit a request through the website form or a messenger, or call me directly.
At the consultation you describe your situation, I review the materials, form a position, and advise on the next steps.
We sign a legal services agreement — and get to work.
Answer. If the PFU refused to award or recalculate your pension; if your service was not credited due to errors in the work record book; if preferential or military service was not taken into account; if you need a recalculation after a new certificate of monetary allowance; if the PFU reduced your payments without grounds.
Answer. First, get a written refusal with explanations. Then a lawyer will check whether the decision is lawful and prepare a claim. Most refusals are unfounded — even inaccuracies in the work record book do not deprive a person of the right to a pension; the court can order the PFU to reconsider the application.
Answer. Yes, even if the PFU database has no record of contribution payments. Documents on business registration, tax returns, or certificates are enough. Court practice confirms that such periods can be credited.
Answer. Yes. Employees who worked in hazardous or difficult conditions are entitled to a preferential pension under Lists No. 1 and No. 2. Service must be confirmed by certificates or archival documents; if the Commission refuses, a lawyer can challenge the decision in court.
Answer. Based on an updated certificate of monetary allowance from the military unit. If the PFU refuses, a lawyer files a claim and seeks correction of the pension amount through the court.
Answer. An unclear stamp, a correction, or a missing order number cannot be grounds for refusal. A lawyer will prove the employment relationship with archival documents, certificates, and witness testimony and secure the crediting of the service.
Answer. Yes, if the application is filed within three months of turning 60. If the refusal is unlawful, a lawyer can secure, through the court, a pension awarded from the correct date and recovery of unpaid amounts.
Answer. At the first consultation (up to 20 minutes) we will go through your situation in detail. I will review the documents, honestly assess the case's prospects, and suggest a concrete step-by-step plan of action. You will get clarity, even if you decide not to continue working with me.
Answer. The first consultation is free. The cost of further services depends on how complex the case is. I always state the full, transparent cost before starting any work. No hidden fees.
Answer. No professional attorney can promise a 100% win, since the decision is made by the court. What I do promise is a thorough analysis of the case, my full effort, complete confidentiality, and the use of all my experience to protect your interests.
Answer. Completely. Everything you discuss with me is protected by attorney–client privilege from the first second of our conversation — even during the free consultation. This is an inviolable rule of the profession.
Answer. Click the "Free consultation" button on the website or call me. We will pick a convenient time, you will briefly describe the problem, and we will start solving it.
In August 2023, he helped me with marriage registration, without fuss and complication. First a phone consultation, then a meeting at the office, and then the result, just as we ag…
Fate introduced me to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych more than two years ago. When I was in complete confusion due to a decision issued against me, I was looking for legal assistance. Our c…
I contacted Yaroslav regarding a traffic accident, or more precisely, a situation when the case was dragged out and closed under article 38. Accordingly, I did not receive payment …
Thank you for detailed consultation and professional help! I turned to more than one lawyer – without results. Besides exorbitant prices and lack of any guarantees, each time I was…
Yaroslav Vitaliiovych helped me dissolve my marriage in October this year. He answered all my questions quickly and clearly. Thank you for the quality handling of the case and for …
I want to express my gratitude to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych and his team. I was an intern there, and the atmosphere and conditions were positive and supportive throughout the internshi…
Thank you for helping resolve a traffic accident case in Kharkiv. The lawyer helped solve the problem and keep our rights intact. I recommend to everyone who wants quality service …
He helped me win a family law case. I liked the consultation and the full case management. I didn't even have to go to court. I'm satisfied with the result. I recommend!
Very glad I chose lawyer Yaroslav Shumeiko. I found him myself, mainly from reviews about problems under article 130. Very satisfied with the help received, thank you! The price fo…
A true professional. Quickly helps resolve any issues. Big thanks to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych for your attentiveness. Quality at the highest level
I contacted him regarding an illegal fine. Very impressed with the client approach and loyalty. Thank you for professionalism and good service. The case was won without my personal…
I contacted him about an illegal fine. He helped resolve the problem quickly and professionally. I recommend to everyone if you have any questions in the field of 'automobile law'.
Reviews translated from Ukrainian.
