Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp
Your reliable partner in protecting drivers' rights at every step.
Defense in road traffic accident (RTA) cases, driving under the influence (DUI), challenging police actions, recovering a driving licence, and disputes with insurance companies.
I help people defend their rights in courts across Ukraine. I work honestly: I explain the case's prospects and the full cost before starting any work.
The exact cost of handling your case can only be determined after a consultation.
The client was accused of moving the car without authorization during an RTA, although there was no direct evidence of guilt.
A motion to close the proceedings was filed due to lack of evidence and missed deadlines; the client's written explanations were submitted.
The proceedings were closed for lack of elements of an offence; the ruling entered into legal force.
Case in the register ↗The client was accused of hitting a curb and a manhole cover and failing to comply with a police stop order; the client denied driving the car.
A motion and evidence referencing video footage were submitted; attention was drawn to the destruction of video recordings and the missed deadline for imposing a penalty.
The proceedings were closed for lack of elements of an offence and due to the expiry of the deadline for imposing a penalty.
Case in the register ↗The client was accused of driving under the influence of alcohol; the case materials contained procedural defects.
The evidence base was challenged, pointing to violations in drafting the protocol and insufficient evidence of driving.
The court of appeal granted the complaint and closed the proceedings for lack of elements of an offence.
Case in the register ↗The client was found guilty of driving while intoxicated; the fact of driving and the lawfulness of the stop were not proven.
The lack of evidence of driving and violations of the examination procedure were challenged; defects in the protocol were highlighted.
The client was accused of hitting a pedestrian and leaving the scene of the accident; there was no evidence of damage to the car or injuries to the victim.
Arguments were presented on the lack of proof of the fact and the absence of a vehicle inspection; the ineffectiveness of the victim's statements was emphasized.
The proceedings were closed for lack of elements of an offence; the ruling entered into legal force.
Case in the register ↗The client was fined and had their licence suspended for driving with signs of intoxication; there were doubts about the accuracy of the measurements and evidence.
The unconvincing nature of the evidence and procedural violations were shown; a request was made to apply Article 22 of the CUAO (insignificance of the offence).
The court of appeal exempted the client from penalty due to the insignificance of the offence, limiting it to an oral warning.
Case in the register ↗You submit a request through the website form or a messenger, or call me directly.
At the consultation you describe your situation, I review the materials, form a position, and advise on the next steps.
We sign a legal services agreement — and get to work.
Answer. Stop the car, turn on the hazard lights, set up a warning triangle, call the police, record the circumstances on photo/video, and note witnesses' contact details. Do not admit fault without consulting a lawyer, and contact an auto lawyer to protect your rights.
Answer. Yes, in many cases this helps to avoid a fine or reduce it, and to challenge unlawful police actions. A lawyer will check the lawfulness of the protocol, the availability of evidence, and the correctness of how the materials were prepared.
Answer. Do not sign any documents without reading them, and insist on a lawyer being present. Check whether the examination procedure was carried out in full compliance with the requirements — a violation of it may be grounds for overturning the court ruling.
Answer. Yes. If the licence was confiscated unlawfully or in violation of procedure, a lawyer can challenge such actions in court and secure its return. The key is to act quickly and record all the circumstances.
Answer. You need to check the insurance contract, its terms, and the grounds for refusal. In many cases the refusal can be challenged in court, or payment can be obtained out of court with a lawyer's help.
Answer. At the first consultation (up to 20 minutes) we will go through your situation in detail. I will review the documents, honestly assess the case's prospects, and suggest a concrete step-by-step plan of action. You will get clarity, even if you decide not to continue working with me.
Answer. The first consultation is free. The cost of further services depends on how complex the case is. I always state the full, transparent cost before starting any work. No hidden fees.
Answer. No professional attorney can promise a 100% win, since the decision is made by the court. What I do promise is a thorough analysis of the case, my full effort, complete confidentiality, and the use of all my experience to protect your interests.
Answer. Completely. Everything you discuss with me is protected by attorney–client privilege from the first second of our conversation — even during the free consultation. This is an inviolable rule of the profession.
Answer. Click the "Free consultation" button on the website or call me. We will pick a convenient time, you will briefly describe the problem, and we will start solving it.
A significant part of cases under Article 130 of the CUAO are decided not in the courtroom, but in the first hours after being pulled over — by what a person recorded on the spot, and whether the deadlines were met.
As long as only property damage is involved, this is Article 124 of the CUAO and proceedings under the CUAO. But as soon as the victim sustains bodily injuries, the case moves into criminal proceedings (Article 286 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), which involves a different procedure, different deadlines, and different consequences.
Actions that are appropriate in an administrative case can hurt you in criminal proceedings. An explanation given "to be released sooner" can later become evidence. That is why the legal classification of the situation should be clarified right away, not after being summoned to an investigator.
This is a common situation, and it has a solution. Payment under compulsory motor third-party liability insurance (MTPL) is limited by a cap, and the actual damage often exceeds it.
If the insurance payment is not enough to fully compensate the damage, the difference between the actual amount of damage and the insurance payment is paid by the party at fault. It can be recovered even after the insurer has already paid its share.
To recover this difference, you need documents from the scene, an assessment of the cost of restoration repairs, and a correctly identified defendant — who is not always the driver.
A driving licence is not returned automatically once the ban period expires: you need to apply to an MIA service centre, and in some cases retake the exams. If the ruling has already entered into legal force but you believe it is unlawful, review proceedings remain an option — narrower than an appeal, but not closed.
In August 2023, he helped me with marriage registration, without fuss and complication. First a phone consultation, then a meeting at the office, and then the result, just as we ag…
Fate introduced me to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych more than two years ago. When I was in complete confusion due to a decision issued against me, I was looking for legal assistance. Our c…
I contacted Yaroslav regarding a traffic accident, or more precisely, a situation when the case was dragged out and closed under article 38. Accordingly, I did not receive payment …
Thank you for detailed consultation and professional help! I turned to more than one lawyer – without results. Besides exorbitant prices and lack of any guarantees, each time I was…
Yaroslav Vitaliiovych helped me dissolve my marriage in October this year. He answered all my questions quickly and clearly. Thank you for the quality handling of the case and for …
I want to express my gratitude to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych and his team. I was an intern there, and the atmosphere and conditions were positive and supportive throughout the internshi…
Thank you for helping resolve a traffic accident case in Kharkiv. The lawyer helped solve the problem and keep our rights intact. I recommend to everyone who wants quality service …
He helped me win a family law case. I liked the consultation and the full case management. I didn't even have to go to court. I'm satisfied with the result. I recommend!
Very glad I chose lawyer Yaroslav Shumeiko. I found him myself, mainly from reviews about problems under article 130. Very satisfied with the help received, thank you! The price fo…
A true professional. Quickly helps resolve any issues. Big thanks to Yaroslav Vitaliiovych for your attentiveness. Quality at the highest level
I contacted him regarding an illegal fine. Very impressed with the client approach and loyalty. Thank you for professionalism and good service. The case was won without my personal…
I contacted him about an illegal fine. He helped resolve the problem quickly and professionally. I recommend to everyone if you have any questions in the field of 'automobile law'.
Reviews translated from Ukrainian.
